skip to content
BooksReddit

Book · 2018

Accelerate

by Nicole Forsgren

Nicole Forsgren's research team ran the numbers on software delivery and found that deployment frequency and stability move together, not against each other.

56
Total mentions
43
Unique Reddit accounts
case-insensitively deduplicated across the selected corpus
+0.18
Avg sentiment
scored published excerpts: −1 pan ↔ +1 praise
6
Subreddits
where it's mentioned

What does Reddit think of Accelerate?

r/devops treats it as a reading list anchor — the ↑131 comment places it in a curated org culture list alongside The Phoenix Project and The DevOps Handbook. r/ExperiencedDevs cites it more argumentatively: the ↑178 comment invokes the DORA originators by name to shut down misuse of agile metrics as a management stick, and the ↑90 comment links it as empirical evidence that good work is actually faster on any reasonable timescale. r/programming adds 6 mentions, broadly positive, mostly in threads about why Scrum stalls teams and why CI/CD architecture matters more than ceremonies. The sentiment across r/devops runs neutral; r/ExperiencedDevs is similar. Commenters treat the book as a citation, not a revelation. The DORA metrics have largely escaped the book and entered ambient DevOps vocabulary, which may explain why mention volume peaked in 2021 at 20 and has drifted down since.

Community feedback & reader fit

Themes

  • · DORA metrics and DevOps measurement
  • · Software delivery performance research
  • · Deployment frequency and change failure rate
  • · Evidence-based arguments for engineering quality
  • · Speed and stability as the same variable

Common praise

  • + The four-metric framework gives engineering managers something concrete to put in front of business stakeholders.
  • + The research backing separates it from most DevOps books, which are either war stories or frameworks without data.
  • + r/programming readers cite it when making the case that CI/CD investment has measurable returns.

Common criticism

  • − The ↑178 r/ExperiencedDevs comment warns directly that management can pick up the DORA metrics and use them as a new stick to beat developers with.
  • − Mention volume has been declining since 2021; the ideas have become ambient vocabulary, which raises the bar for what the book itself adds.

Who it's for

Engineering managers who need a citation, not a conversion. If your organization already believes in CI/CD and short lead times, Accelerate gives you the research to defend those positions in budget conversations. Developers who are already living the practices described will find it confirms what they know. Readers who want implementation guidance — how to actually build the pipelines and culture — will want The DevOps Handbook alongside it, which is how r/devops treats the two books.

Mentions over time

Q2 2019 peak: 6/qtr Q1 2026

Top subreddits

Which Reddit comments matter for Accelerate?

Top-upvoted quotes across the subreddits where this book is mentioned. Click through to read the full thread.

We've lost several senior-level people in my organization due to our decision to bring everyone back on-site. \* There's a lot of speculation in the child comments -- basically CEO said "we're bringing everyone back because that's what is best for the company". Managers weren't really given a line …

r/cscareerquestions ↑ 621 mixed

Same as small-a agile. If the leadership understands it, it's a positive. If they don't get it, and abuse it to carry on with the status quo but with a new stick to beat developers with, it's a negative. I recommend reading Accelerate to hear from the originators of DORA what the metrics are desig…

r/ExperiencedDevs ↑ 178 positive

This is the list I made for work: **Culture/Organization** * The Phoenix Project (Kim/Spafford/Behr, 2013): allegorical novel that uses fiction to teach us about the advantages of modern IT culture (agile, CI/CD, etc.) * [The U…

r/devops ↑ 131 mixed

Good work is actually faster on any reasonable timescale. Source This is actually a research finding. Source

r/ExperiencedDevs ↑ 90 positive

Bad management love scrum. Edit: scrum is a good gateway to better agility, but people get stuck there and end up wasting too much time on estimating, planning, grooming and refining a backlog. In most cases, improving your test strategy, ci/cd pipeline, team collaboration and architecture to a…

r/programming ↑ 82 positive

The DevOps Research and Assessment (DORA) team has identified four metrics that measure DevOps performance. Using these metrics helps improve DevOps efficiency and communicate performance to business stakeholders, which can accelerate business results. DORA includes four key metrics, divided into t…

r/ExperiencedDevs ↑ 78 mixed

You’re the senior/team lead. Lead by proposing better processes. All of our code is run through linters and automated tests. A member of the the team that owns the package must approve. We also require an approval from a “calibrated” reviewer, someone who has shown a history of good code reviews. …

r/ExperiencedDevs ↑ 75 mixed

DevOps Handbook by Gene Kim and others is good to read through and/or as a reference. Making Work Visible by Dominica Degrandis is wonderful for dealing with invisible w…

r/devops ↑ 70 mixed

Readers also mention

Books that share discussion threads with Accelerate — counted from the comments, not curated.

Accelerate — frequently asked

What does Reddit think of Accelerate's DORA metrics?+

The ↑90 comment links it as evidence that quality work is faster on any reasonable timescale.

Is Accelerate still worth reading if I already know what the DORA metrics are?+

Depends on why you'd read it. The metrics themselves are freely available from DORA's annual reports. What the book adds is the original research methodology and the argument for why these four metrics predict business outcomes. If you need to make that case internally, the book is useful. If you just need the numbers, the free reports suffice.

How does Accelerate fit with The Phoenix Project?+

r/devops treats them as a set. The ↑131 comment lists them in the same reading curriculum: Phoenix Project for the narrative, DevOps Handbook for implementation, Accelerate for the research backing. The Phoenix Project is fiction; Accelerate is the evidence that the fiction describes something real.

Can Accelerate's metrics be misused by management?+

Yes, and Reddit says so explicitly. The ↑178 r/ExperiencedDevs comment — one of the most-upvoted Accelerate mentions in that sub — warns that leadership that doesn't understand the metrics will abuse them as performance sticks. The comment recommends reading Accelerate specifically to hear from the DORA originators what the metrics are designed to measure and what they aren't.