skip to content
BooksReddit

Book · 2022

An Immense World: How Animal Senses Reveal the Hidden Realms Around Us

by Ed Yong

Ed Yong maps the hidden sensory worlds of animals — from the electric fields sharks feel to the ultraviolet colors butterflies see — that exist just outside human perception.

2
Total mentions
2
Unique users
+0.80
Avg sentiment
−1 pan ↔ +1 praise
1
Subreddit
where it's mentioned

What does Reddit think of An Immense World: How Animal Senses Reveal the Hidden Realms Around Us?

An Immense World has 2 mentions across Reddit's tracked subs, both from r/askscience in 2022, both arriving with neutral sentiment. That's a thin data set, but the two comments that do exist are useful: one (↑15) invokes the book to rebut the notion that human senses are universally weak, pointing to Ed Yong's argument that our vision holds up favorably against most animals; the other (↑14) recommends it outright as "fantastically interesting." Neither is a throwaway. r/askscience commenters tend toward precision, and when they cite a popular-science book, they usually mean it. Two mentions don't generate a consensus, so there's no contested take to report, no split between subreddits, no dissenting thread to quote. What exists is a narrow but genuine signal: scientists and science-literate readers reached for this book when the question was what animals actually perceive, and they cited it as an authority rather than a starting point.

Community feedback & reader fit

Themes

  • · animal sensory biology
  • · umwelt — the species-specific perceptual world
  • · echolocation and non-visual navigation
  • · electroreception and magnetoreception
  • · human senses in comparative perspective

Common praise

  • + r/askscience commenters cite it when correcting misconceptions about human senses, which means it's doing real argumentative work in technical threads.
  • + The ↑15 comment treats Yong's comparative framework as settled enough to quote without hedging.
  • + A second commenter calls it "fantastically interesting" and links the Goodreads page — that's a rec, not a hedge.

Common criticism

  • − Two total mentions in seven years of tracking means Reddit hasn't stress-tested the book's claims in the way denser discussions would.
  • − No r/biology or r/evolution threads surfaced in the data, so its reception among specialist subreddits is unknown.

Who it's for

If you've ever read a pop-science piece about animal senses and wanted three hundred pages of follow-through, this is the book. It works for readers who already know the word "umwelt" and for those encountering it for the first time. The r/askscience commenters reaching for it were trying to win factual arguments, which suggests the book delivers citable specifics rather than vague wonder. Casual naturalists will find it readable; anyone who thinks human perception is the default setting for sensory experience will find it corrective.

Mentions over time

Q4 2022 peak: 2/qtr Q4 2022

Top subreddits

Which Reddit comments matter for An Immense World: How Animal Senses Reveal the Hidden Realms Around Us?

Top-upvoted quotes across the subreddits where this book is mentioned. Click through to read the full thread.

Humans’ senses are not terrible, depending. Ed Yong in the excellent An Immense World identifies our sense of sight as quite broad by comparison with a few noted animals, and as you say, with focus even smell/scent and hearing are okay — blind humans can learn to echolocate, which may be limited but…

r/askscience ↑ 15 positive

A fantastically interesting book about the different senses that animals have is _An Immense World_ by Ed Yong:

r/askscience ↑ 14 positive

What else does r/askscience read?

Other books mentioned in the same sub, ranked. Shared-sub overlap with this title breaks ties.

An Immense World: How Animal Senses Reveal the Hidden Realms Around Us — frequently asked

What does Reddit actually say about An Immense World?+

Not much yet — 2 mentions, both from r/askscience in 2022. But both comments are substantive: one uses the book to defend human sensory capabilities in a comparative context (↑15), the other recommends it plainly as "fantastically interesting" (↑14). For a book this specialized, two precise citations from a science-literate sub is a decent early signal.

Is An Immense World scientifically accurate enough for r/askscience standards?+

Based on available data, yes. The two r/askscience commenters who cite it do so to support factual claims, not as a vague popularity vote. One leans on Yong's comparative sight data to rebut a specific question about human senses. That's the kind of use that implies the book holds up to scrutiny, though the sample size is small.

Should I read An Immense World if I've already read other animal-cognition books?+

The Reddit data doesn't offer a direct comparison to titles like Are We Smart Enough for What Animals Think? — no commenter has stacked them side by side. What the r/askscience thread suggests is that Yong's focus is specifically sensory biology rather than cognition broadly, so overlap is probably limited. Worth reading on its own terms.

Is An Immense World worth reading in 2026?+

The Reddit signal is thin but positive. Two mentions from r/askscience, both neutral in measured sentiment, both practical in intent — commenters reached for this book when they needed a specific, reliable answer about animal senses. Books that get cited to win arguments in science subreddits tend to earn that role. The data doesn't contradict the recommendation.