skip to content
BooksReddit

Book · 2016

I Contain Multitudes: The Microbes Within Us and a Grander View of Life

by Ed Yong

Ed Yong takes the microbiome from lab jargon to something that makes you look at every living thing differently.

4
Total mentions
4
Unique users
+0.70
Avg sentiment
−1 pan ↔ +1 praise
1
Subreddit
where it's mentioned

What does Reddit think of I Contain Multitudes: The Microbes Within Us and a Grander View of Life?

All four Reddit mentions of I Contain Multitudes live in r/askscience, and every single one is a recommendation rather than a critique. That uniformity is telling. The commenters aren't debating the book; they're deploying it as an answer. Someone asks about microbiomes, and three or four separate people reach for the same title. The top comment (↑24) calls it 'heavy' while still praising how Yong frames the microbiome as 'a new frontier' and points to a Guardian synopsis as further reading. The ↑20 and ↑7 replies are shorter and warmer: 'fascinating', 'easy to understand'. The fourth mention (↑6) pairs it with another microbiome text in a discussion about acne and skin biomes. Four mentions, four unique commenters, all between 2022 and 2023, all in one subreddit. The data is thin enough that no negative signal exists — not because people love it without reservation, but because the only people citing it are the ones already recommending it. Treat the sentiment as unscored rather than glowing.

Community feedback & reader fit

Themes

  • · Microbiome science and the human body's microbial ecosystems
  • · Evolutionary relationships between animals and bacteria
  • · Accessible science communication for general audiences
  • · The gut–health frontier and what research is still unsettled

Common praise

  • + Yong makes the microbiome feel like a genuine frontier rather than a health-supplement pitch.
  • + R/askscience commenters consistently reach for it when a thread needs a single accessible book on microbial biology.
  • + The writing stays readable without dumbing down the evolutionary scope — the ↑24 comment calls it heavy, but still recommends it without hesitation.
  • + Works as a standalone introduction that doesn't assume prior biology coursework.

Common criticism

  • − The book skews toward survey breadth; readers who want mechanistic depth on any single microbiome topic will need something more technical alongside it.
  • − With only 4 Reddit mentions across tracked years, the community conversation is too thin to surface real dissent — absence of criticism here is a data gap, not a verdict.

Who it's for

If you've seen a microbiome claim on a health podcast and wanted to know what the science actually says, this is the place to start. R/askscience regulars recommend it for exactly that function: a single book that covers enough ground to make follow-up reading make sense. It also works well for someone who finished something like The Selfish Gene and wants the same explanatory ambition applied to host–microbe coevolution. Graduate-level microbiologists will find little new, but they're not the audience the r/askscience threads are imagining when they reach for this title.

Mentions over time

Q4 2022 peak: 2/qtr Q4 2023

Top subreddits

Which Reddit comments matter for I Contain Multitudes: The Microbes Within Us and a Grander View of Life?

Top-upvoted quotes across the subreddits where this book is mentioned. Click through to read the full thread.

"I contain multitudes" by Ed Yong is also a great book on the subject. It does get pretty heavy but summarizes the big picture of our evolution with microbes. He often compares the microbiome to a new frontier. Here's a good synopsis of the book

r/askscience ↑ 24 positive

A good book that goes into more details about this is I Contain Multitudes. Very fascinating

r/askscience ↑ 20 positive

If you’re interested in reading a really cool book about micobiomes, the book ‘I Contain Multitudes’ by Ed Yong is great. It answers this question in a great and easy to understand way. It was a fascinating read.

r/askscience ↑ 7 positive

Possibly. The book I mentioned discusses biomes. A other good book on microviolws is I Contain Multitudes I also suspect that over time, what microbes cause microbial caused acne has changed or drifted. Edit; sensitivities to chemicals and such in soaps can also cause acne, as per the other post…

r/askscience ↑ 6 positive

What else does r/askscience read?

Other books mentioned in the same sub, ranked. Shared-sub overlap with this title breaks ties.

I Contain Multitudes: The Microbes Within Us and a Grander View of Life — frequently asked

What does Reddit actually say about I Contain Multitudes?+

All 4 Reddit mentions are in r/askscience, and every one is a recommendation rather than a review. The top comment (↑24) describes it as 'heavy' but endorses it as the go-to book for understanding how humans co-evolved with microbes. There's no negative signal in the data, though the sample is small enough that that absence means little.

Is I Contain Multitudes a good starting point if I know nothing about microbiomes?+

Yes, based on how r/askscience deploys it. Commenters consistently recommend it in response to basic microbiome questions, and one explicitly calls it 'easy to understand' (↑7). The ↑24 comment warns it 'gets pretty heavy' on evolutionary history, so expect some density — but the consensus is that Yong earns the difficulty.

How does I Contain Multitudes compare to other microbiome books on Reddit?+

In the tracked r/askscience threads, it gets cited alongside at least one other microbiome text (in a skin/acne discussion), but it's the title people name first. No direct comparison to a rival book appears in the data with enough upvotes to be conclusive.

Is I Contain Multitudes still relevant in 2026?+

Depends on how fast the specific science moves for you. The core evolutionary framework Yong builds holds up; the cutting-edge claims about specific health interventions have likely been refined or qualified since publication. R/askscience mentions peaked in 2022–2023 and dropped off, which may reflect the book aging out of 'current recommendation' territory for some commenters.