skip to content
BooksReddit

Book · 1973

A Random Walk Down Wall Street

by Burton G. Malkiel

Burton Malkiel's 50-year argument that you can't beat the market, backed by data, and Reddit's most-cited reason to stop stock-picking.

175
Total mentions
128
Unique Reddit accounts
case-insensitively deduplicated across the selected corpus
+0.61
Avg sentiment
scored published excerpts: −1 pan ↔ +1 praise
3
Subreddits
where it's mentioned

What does Reddit think of A Random Walk Down Wall Street?

r/Bogleheads leads with 102 mentions and treats the book as foundational scripture — one ↑565 comment invokes it to explain why panic-selling ignores 50 years of market history. The usage pattern is consistent: Malkiel gets cited alongside The Four Pillars of Investing and Irrational Exuberance as psychological preparation for drawdowns, not just an intellectual exercise. Volume spiked in 2021 to 34 mentions, matched again in 2024 and 2025 — bull-market years both, when the temptation to deviate from passive investing is loudest. One dissent surfaces in the data: a ↑119 comment dismisses a different book as "shit" then immediately lists Random Walk among the good ones, which says something about where it lands in the hierarchy.

Community feedback & reader fit

Themes

  • · passive investing and index funds
  • · efficient market hypothesis
  • · behavioral psychology of market cycles
  • · stock-picking as a losing strategy
  • · long-term wealth building

Common praise

  • + Prepares readers psychologically for market drawdowns before they experience one.
  • + Gets recommended as the first book when someone arrives asking about individual stocks.
  • + Survives across bull and bear cycles — 34 mentions in both 2021 and 2025.
  • + Pairs naturally with The Four Pillars of Investing as a one-two foundation for passive investors.
  • + r/Bogleheads treats it as so fundamental that citing it ends arguments rather than opening them.

Common criticism

  • − Dense enough that r/investing readers suggest it as preparation, not light reading.
  • − Gets bundled into recommendation lists rather than discussed on its own terms — the data has almost no quotes unpacking specific chapters.
  • − The efficient market hypothesis sits badly with r/investing readers who still want to try stock-picking, even when they recommend the book.

Who it's for

You're about to put real money into individual stocks because index funds seem boring. Read this first. It's also the book r/Bogleheads hands to people who are rattled by a downturn and need a historical argument, not reassurance. If you've already converted to passive investing and want the theoretical scaffolding behind that decision, Malkiel provides it. Someone who read The Intelligent Investor and found it too focused on business valuation will find this covers the ground Graham ignores.

Mentions over time

Q1 2019 peak: 15/qtr Q1 2026

Top subreddits

Which Reddit comments matter for A Random Walk Down Wall Street?

Top-upvoted quotes across the subreddits where this book is mentioned. Click through to read the full thread.

It’s like A Random Walk Down Wall Street was never written. The sky always seems to be falling, yet the market continues to rise over time.

r/Bogleheads ↑ 565 positive

A random walk down Wall Street is one of my all time favorites. He’s updated it a few times and I’ve bought a couple different ones

r/personalfinance ↑ 409 positive

Individual stocks are good, but index funds are where I park most of my money. A really good resource is A Random Walk Down Wall Street — I would read that first. Bill Ackman has a great video on YouTube called Everything You Need to Know (here). That will give you a…

r/investing ↑ 315 positive

There are classic books that explain in detail why trying to pick individual stocks "is a loser's game". Chief among them is A Random Walk Down Wall Street. I would spend my summer reading these two books. If you want to try your hand at stock picking I wouldn't go 50:50. I would use 10% or less of …

r/investing ↑ 225 Not scored

If you really want to begin understanding “the catch” read The Four Pillars of Investing by William Bernstein and Random Walk Down Wall Street by Burton Malkiel. They will help you prepare psychologically for market drawdowns and not be pulled into manias and bubbles, such as what’s going on with bi…

r/Bogleheads ↑ 157 Not scored

That book is s*** and the author is a fraud. Here's some good books: The Bogleheads’ Guide to Investing The Four Pillars of Investing A Random Walk Down Wall Street The Psychology of Money Same as Ever Common Sense Investing

r/investing ↑ 119 positive

The intelligent investor was my first investing book. I found it dense, I thought it was a little outdated but nevertheless it taught the idea of investing in the business. I recommending you supplement your reading with: 1. The little red book on common sense investing 2. Irrational Exuberance 3…

r/investing ↑ 114 Not scored

As of this writing, Burton Malkiel is still with us. If you haven’t yet read “A Random Walk Down Wall Street” then you owe it to yourself to do so.

r/Bogleheads ↑ 100 positive

Readers also mention

Books that share discussion threads with A Random Walk Down Wall Street — counted from the comments, not curated.

A Random Walk Down Wall Street — frequently asked

What does Reddit actually think of A Random Walk Down Wall Street?+

Broadly positive, with almost no dissent on the book itself. The closest thing to a knock is that it gets list-cited rather than deeply analyzed — readers recommend it as foundational but rarely quote specific chapters. The ↑565 comment on r/Bogleheads using it to argue against panic-selling is the book's best Reddit ambassador.

Should I read A Random Walk Down Wall Street before or after The Intelligent Investor?+

r/investing recommends Random Walk first when someone is starting from zero. One ↑225 comment calls it chief among the books explaining why stock-picking is a loser's game and suggests reading it before attempting any individual names. The Intelligent Investor skews toward business valuation; Malkiel skews toward market structure. They answer different questions.

Is A Random Walk Down Wall Street still relevant in 2026?+

Yes, and the data shows it. Mentions held at 34 in both 2024 and 2025, matching the 2021 peak. The ↑100 r/Bogleheads comment from the data explicitly notes Malkiel is still alive and the book is worth reading on that basis alone. The efficient market argument doesn't age the way stock-picking tactics do.

Which subreddit talks about A Random Walk Down Wall Street the most?+

r/Bogleheads, with 102 of the 175 total mentions. That tracks: the Boglehead community is built around passive indexing, and Malkiel is one of its intellectual cornerstones. r/investing accounts for 72, mostly in beginner recommendation threads where someone needs to be talked out of picking their own stocks.