Book · 2006
The Wages of Destruction: The Making and Breaking of the Nazi Economy
by Adam Tooze
Adam Tooze's account of how Nazi Germany's economic desperation drove the war machine — and why it was always running out of time.
What does Reddit think of The Wages of Destruction: The Making and Breaking of the Nazi Economy?
Of the 35 Reddit mentions tracked over seven years, 29 come from r/AskHistorians — the single sub most likely to cite primary historiography rather than popular narrative. That weighting tells you something. Tooze's argument — that the Nazi war economy was structurally fragile from the start, that Hitler gambled on speed precisely because Germany couldn't sustain a long war — lands best in threads where someone is already pushing back on the 'stab in the back' myth or interrogating the late-war armaments surge. r/AskHistorians commenters return to it when explaining why the attack on Poland was a deliberate choice to start a world war rather than a miscalculation, and when unpacking why the NSDAP's voter base skewed rural and lower-middle-class. r/history accounts for 6 of the 38 mentions, last logged in 2021. The book doesn't generate passion; it generates citations.
Community feedback & reader fit
Themes
- · Nazi war economy and structural resource constraints
- · Hitler's strategic gamble on blitzkrieg speed over sustained production
- · The relationship between economic ideology and military aggression
- · German domestic politics and the NSDAP's social base
- · Late-war German armaments production and its limits
- · Hyperinflation, currency reform, and Weimar economic memory
Common praise
- + r/AskHistorians commenters cite it as the go-to rebuttal to the 'stab in the back' mythology, treating it as settled rather than debatable.
- + The Poland chapter makes the case that Hitler chose world war deliberately — not through miscalculation — and that framing appears repeatedly across high-upvote threads (↑211).
- + The late-war armaments surge section actually resolves a specific historiographical dispute that comes up in threads about German industrial capacity.
- + Tooze's voter-base breakdown — rural, male, lower middle class — gives r/AskHistorians respondents a structural anchor that generic political histories don't.
Common criticism
- − The 35-mention count over seven years is modest for a book this frequently described as definitive; it functions as a citation rather than a recommendation people proactively make.
- − r/history engagement dropped off after 2021 — six mentions total — suggesting it hasn't crossed over to the more casual history audience.
- − At 900 pages of economic history, nobody in the tracked threads calls it a page-turner; it shows up when an argument needs resolving, not when someone asks what to read next.
Who it's for
If you've hit the ceiling of popular WWII histories and want to understand why Germany was structurally committed to aggression regardless of Hitler's personality, this is the next book. You don't need an economics background — but you do need patience for the kind of argument that takes 900 pages to make properly. r/AskHistorians regulars treat it as essential infrastructure: something you've read so you can say something precise when the Speer myth comes up. Casual readers who want narrative over mechanism will find it slow going.
Mentions over time
Top subreddits
Which Reddit comments matter for The Wages of Destruction: The Making and Breaking of the Nazi Economy?
The most relevant excerpts across the subreddits where this book is mentioned — opinionated, argued takes first, then top-upvoted mentions. Click through to read the full thread.
“To start, it should be said that Hitler and his ilk did not believe that the German Army had ever lost "The Great War", believing in the "Stab in the Back" where republicans and Jews back in Germany had sold out the military which still had a fighting chance, so it can be said that part of the mytho…
“I'm not sure what you mean by "moneyed interests". If you're talking about the old German or Prussian aristocracy he was personally opposed to any political power outside his own and that of the National Socialist movement (he decreed that no members of former royal houses be given command in the We…
“I would say that a desire to overturn the current global economic order was a driving force for all three Axis powers and the fascist parties that ran them. All were at least in part motivated by grievances each state had with the world order of the time, which combined with their ultra nationalism,…
“Ok, I’ll try to go through your points one by one. - the Nazis‘ voter base can be broadly summed up in three characteristics: rural, male, and (lower) middle class. The NSDAP made a conscious effort to appeal to agrarian and small-town communities, and they were fairly successful in these efforts. …
“The attack on Poland came as the culmination of a great political crisis, but it wasn’t the direct result of faulty diplomacy or Hitler’s miscalculation, but a deliberate decision to start a world war. This invasion was merely the latest scheme in Hitler’s plan for making Germany self-sufficient i…
“The second type of anti-fascist ‘violence’ that can succeed is disruptive. Here, the goal is not to overwhelm or intimidate, but to create disproportionate difficulties for a fascist political performance while making it difficult to claim victimhood. Think a handful of activists standing up mid-spe…
“Historians have proposed a variety of explanations for the late war boom in German armaments production, each of which has an element of truth. Perhaps the most simple explanation is that Germany devoted a greater portion of its economy toward armaments production in the final years of the war. In …
“This is a very complicated question but let's begin with German hyperinflation. Most of those pictures are from immediately after WW1 in the early 1920s. After 1923 the German economy recovered and reformed its currency (and stopped printing marks) and there wasn't another instance of hyperinflati…
“**Part II** Many of the German managers of American subsidiaries shared these conservative sentiments that Nazism was a better alternative than either the Republic or communism and braced their companies for navigating the New Order. The National Socialist celebration of the leadership cult also fo…
“I also recommend *The Wages of Destruction* by Adam Tooze, which offers an examination of the economic history of the Third Reich. Professor Tooze does a good job debunking the “Nazi economic miracle” myth, in my opinion.
“The infirmary existed to support the policy of destruction through labor. My source here is the Wages of Destruction by Adam Tooze a book I highly recommend that explores the economic basis of the Nazi regime and the short answer is that by Barbarossa the German War Economy was already fully mobil…
“So we have to begin this by pointing out at the very start that the Nazis were not according to all modern and classical definitions, socialists. Richard Evans describes National "Socialism" in his book Coming of the Third Reich thusly >Despite the change of name, however, it would be wrong to see …
“Hitler was quite conscious of the importance of American economic support to the Allies in WWI. The intent of his alliance with Japan was to encourage their Pacific ambitions to distract the US from involvement in Europe. But by December 1941, the US had been providing critical support to Britain f…
“I think that view was pretty much demolished by Tooze in 2006, but he was only really hammering nails into an already well-closed coffin. I assume that if a college textbook's third edition was 2016 then its first edition is not going to be up to date with 2006 research and writing, nor is it going…
“Primarily The Wages of Destruction by Adam Tooze, with a few details from The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich by Shirer. Tooze'a work is an important source explaining the more modern understanding of the Nazi persecutions being both an economic and political policy from 1934 onwards.
Convinced? Pick up The Wages of Destruction: The Making and Breaking of the Nazi Economy
What else does r/AskHistorians read?
Other books mentioned in the same sub, ranked. Shared-sub overlap with this title breaks ties.
Guides featuring The Wages of Destruction: The Making and Breaking of the Nazi Economy
Ranked best-of lists and editorial guides where this book's tracked mentions place it.
The Wages of Destruction: The Making and Breaking of the Nazi Economy — frequently asked
What does Reddit actually use The Wages of Destruction for?+
Mostly as a citation weapon. Of the 38 mentions tracked, 32 are in r/AskHistorians, where it shows up to resolve specific disputes — the 'stab in the back' myth, the logic behind the Poland invasion, the late-war production surge. It's the kind of book that ends arguments rather than starts conversations. The ↑1632 comment using it to explain the stab-in-the-back belief is typical of how it gets deployed.
Is The Wages of Destruction worth reading if I'm not an economic historian?+
Depends what you want. If you want to understand why Nazi Germany launched the wars it did when it did, yes — Tooze's structural argument about resource constraints and Hitler's speed gamble is the clearest account available. If you want narrative history, probably not first. The r/AskHistorians threads don't recommend it to newcomers; they cite it to people who are already mid-argument.
How does The Wages of Destruction hold up against other WWII economic histories on Reddit?+
It holds up as the standard reference in r/AskHistorians — no competing title appears more frequently in the same threads. The six r/history mentions are comparatively thin, but that sub skews toward narrative works.
Does The Wages of Destruction change how Reddit thinks about late-war German armaments production?+
Yes, in the specific threads where that topic comes up. The ↑195 r/AskHistorians comment walking through the explanations for the late-war boom draws on exactly the framework Tooze provides. Commenters treat the question as already answered.