skip to content
BooksReddit

Book · 2020

Piranesi

by Susanna Clarke

A man alone in an endless house of statues and tides slowly realizes he isn't who the House says he is.

2,159
Total mentions
1,639
Unique users
+0.29
Avg sentiment
−1 pan ↔ +1 praise
4
Subreddits
where it's mentioned

What does Reddit think of Piranesi?

2159 mentions, split almost evenly across four subs the way no other book in this set manages: 971 on r/suggestmeabook, 591 apiece on r/Fantasy and r/printSF. That spread is the story. r/Fantasy treats it as proof "literary fantasy" is a real category, name-checking it alongside Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell as the two poles of Susanna Clarke's range (↑174). One review calls it "curiously empty" and immediately hedges, "possibly that's the point," about as split as consensus gets in this sample (↑174). The dominant advice, repeated across threads, is to start blind: go in knowing as little as possible and let the puzzle of the unreliable narrator resolve on its own (↑240). r/printSF's top quote is stranger, a reader saying the pitch for the book nearly talked them out of reading it (↑236), suspicion of hype rather than the book itself. Mentions peaked in 2021 at 480, the year after publication, then settled into the high-300s range it's held since, 358 in 2025.

Community feedback & reader fit

Themes

  • · unreliable narrator solving his own memory
  • · literary fantasy as a real category
  • · isolation in a vast, rule-bound house
  • · the case for going in blind

Common praise

  • + Readers keep repeating the same advice: go in knowing nothing and let the puzzle resolve on its own (↑240).
  • + r/Fantasy cites it as proof literary fantasy is a real shelf, pairing it with Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell as Clarke's two extremes (↑174).
  • + It gets a flat 'Very good!' with no further justification offered, which on r/Fantasy counts as a strong review (↑399).

Common criticism

  • − One reviewer calls it 'curiously empty' before walking it back with 'possibly that's the point,' the most divided take in the sample (↑174).
  • − A printSF commenter says the sales pitch for it nearly talked them out of reading it at all, suggesting the marketing undersells or oversells depending who's talking (↑236).
  • − Getting paired with Dungeon Crawler Carl in the same breath shows how little genre logic actually governs its recommendation slot (↑252).

Who it's for

Go in cold if you can manage it; the puzzle only works on readers who don't already know what's waiting for them. You'll likely respond to this if Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell worked for you, though Piranesi is a fraction of the length and carries none of the footnotes. Skeptics of "literary fantasy" as a marketing category should sit with the 591-591 split between r/Fantasy and r/printSF before dismissing it. And if "beautiful but empty" sounds like a dealbreaker rather than a feature, the "curiously empty" review is worth reading before you buy the book.

Mentions over time

Q3 2019 peak: 413/qtr Q4 2025

Top subreddits

Which Reddit comments matter for Piranesi?

Top-upvoted quotes across the subreddits where this book is mentioned. Click through to read the full thread.

Literary fantasy ABSOLUTELY exists, as does literary sci-fi and literary horror. However, you probably wouldn't want a fantasy War and Peace, since that book is a slog about how much it annoyed Tolstoy that Russian people wanted to be French. Anyways. Jonathan Strange and Mr. Norrell is a stunnin…

r/Fantasy ↑ 616 mixed

Piranesi by Susanna Clarke (Very good!)

r/Fantasy ↑ 399 positive

Dungeon Crawler Carl & Piranesi

r/Fantasy ↑ 252 mixed

Piranesi. Start reading the book knowing as little as you can, and then it almost reads like a puzzle, where you slowly piece together what's going on through the skewed view of a not very reliable narrator

r/Fantasy ↑ 240 positive

I feel like if I hadn't read Piranesi, this post would make me less likely, not more likely, to read it

r/printSF ↑ 236 positive

Piranesi by Susanna Clarke

r/suggestmeabook ↑ 217 positive

It’s not an exact match, especially when it comes to a fully fleshed society, but *Piranesi* hits on some of your desired elements.  *A Short Stay In Hell* kind of does too, although unlike *Piranesi*, I was pretty disappointed with that one.

r/printSF ↑ 179 positive

Susanna Clarke's Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell, and her latest Piranesi are definitely up at the literary end of fantasy and JS&MN is a wonderful book. Not sure what I think about Piranesi, it's definitely a beautiful book but I also found it curiously empty. Possibly, that's the point.

r/Fantasy ↑ 174 mixed

Readers also mention

All books like Piranesi →

Books that share discussion threads with Piranesi — counted from the comments, not curated.

Piranesi — frequently asked

Should I know anything about Piranesi before I start it?+

No. The dominant advice across the 2159 mentions in this sample is to go in blind, with one top-voted comment (↑240) recommending readers start knowing as little as possible so the puzzle of the unreliable narrator resolves on its own. Spoilers reportedly flatten the experience.

What does Reddit think of Piranesi?+

Mostly enthusiastic but not unanimous. It draws 2159 mentions spread almost evenly across r/suggestmeabook, r/Fantasy, and r/printSF, with one dissenting review calling it 'curiously empty' before conceding 'possibly that's the point' (↑174).

Is Piranesi science fiction or fantasy?+

Neither camp claims it exclusively. r/Fantasy and r/printSF each log exactly 591 mentions, an even split rare in this dataset, while r/suggestmeabook's 971 mentions treat it as general literary fiction first.

Is Piranesi as good as Jonathan Strange & Mr Norrell?+

Reddit treats them as companion pieces rather than a ranked pair. One r/Fantasy comment (↑174) calls both 'up at the literary end of fantasy,' praising Jonathan Strange as 'wonderful' while staying more guarded about Piranesi specifically.