skip to content
BooksReddit

Book · 1923

Reminiscences of a Stock Operator

by Edwin Lefèvre

A 15-year-old starts scalping stocks in bucket shops in the 1890s and spends the next 30 years learning the same lesson the hard way.

6
Total mentions
6
Unique Reddit accounts
case-insensitively deduplicated across the selected corpus
+0.48
Avg sentiment
scored published excerpts: −1 pan ↔ +1 praise
2
Subreddits
where it's mentioned

What does Reddit think of Reminiscences of a Stock Operator?

Six mentions across 7 years is a thin footprint, and 5 of those 6 come from r/investing. Not a cult favorite. More of a steady background recommendation that shows up whenever someone asks what traders actually read. r/investing does the most work here. The ↑20 comment positions the book as a historical corrective: a 1923 text written by someone who started trading in the late 1800s, and its chief value is showing "how tame things are in the modern market." That's a specific claim, not a hype loop. The ↑10 comment flags the bucket shop chapters by name as the practical payoff. r/Bogleheads lands 1 mention at ↑16, pairing it with another title without elaboration. The recommendation pattern is notable. In both the ↑31 and ↑17 threads, the book appears in list form alongside Market Wizards and behavioral finance titles. That's a respectable neighborhood. The data doesn't surface any sustained criticism.

Community feedback & reader fit

Themes

  • · Market psychology and speculation
  • · Historical trading conditions (bucket shops, early exchanges)
  • · Pattern recognition and discipline
  • · The recurring cost of ignoring your own rules

Common praise

  • + The bucket shop chapters explain a now-extinct market structure better than any modern account.
  • + r/investing readers single out the historical perspective — how violent early markets were compared to today.
  • + Shows up in the same reading lists as Market Wizards without being demoted to second tier.

Common criticism

  • − Six total mentions in 7 years suggests the Reddit audience respects it more than it actively re-reads it.
  • − No commenter in the data quotes a specific trade or lesson — it gets named but not unpacked.

Who it's for

You trade actively and want a primary source, not another summary of what traders do wrong. The ↑20 r/investing commenter reads it as historical calibration — markets in the 1890s were structurally different, and the contrast clarifies what's actually changed. If your shelf already has Market Wizards, this pairs naturally; it's the book that Schwager's subjects often cite as formative. Passive index investors who found their way here via r/Bogleheads will likely find it interesting but not actionable.

Mentions over time

Q3 2019 peak: 2/qtr Q4 2024

Top subreddits

Which Reddit comments matter for Reminiscences of a Stock Operator?

Top-upvoted quotes across the subreddits where this book is mentioned. Click through to read the full thread.

Don’t follow anyone. Read some books instead. Here’s a list to get him started: **Behavioral/Psychology** - Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion by Robert Cialdini - Hare Brain, Tortoise Mind by Guy Clayton - What it Takes: Seven Secrets of Success from the World's Greatest Professional Firms by…

r/investing ↑ 31 Not scored

Currently reading Reminiscences of a Stock Operator and it is a pretty amazing read and highlights just how tame things are in the modern market. It was written in 1923 by a trader who started trading at 15yo in the late 1800s.

r/investing ↑ 20 positive

Yes, try Audible and buy these books: 1 Reminiscences of a Stock Operator Edwin Lefevre 2 Market Wizards: Interviews with Top Traders Jack D. Schwager 3 The New Market Wizards: Conversations with America's Top Traders Jack D. Schwager 4 Hedge Fund Market Wizards Jack D. Schwager 5 Adaptive …

r/investing ↑ 17 positive

This and Reminiscences of a Stock Operator

r/Bogleheads ↑ 16 positive

If you're interested in learning more about this type of stuff, there are a few great books on the subject. * [The Great Crash 1929](

r/investing ↑ 16 positive

Yeah that’s what I thought of when I read the quote. Learned about bucket shops in the book “Reminiscences of a Stock Operator”, good book.

r/investing ↑ 10 positive

What else does r/investing read?

Other books mentioned in the same sub, ranked. Shared-sub overlap with this title breaks ties.

Reminiscences of a Stock Operator — frequently asked

Is Reminiscences of a Stock Operator still worth reading in 2026?+

Probably yes, but for historical context rather than tactics. The ↑20 r/investing comment makes the clearest case: the book was written in 1923 by a trader who started in the 1890s, and its value is showing how structurally different — and more violent — early markets were. The bucket shop sections (flagged by name in the ↑10 comment) don't map to anything you can do today, but they're the most vivid part.

What does Reddit think of Reminiscences of a Stock Operator?+

Broadly positive, but low-volume. Five of 6 total mentions come from r/investing over 7 years, usually as a list entry alongside Market Wizards. Nobody argues against it in the data. The ↑20 comment calls it "a pretty amazing read." That's the warmest endorsement on record, and it comes with a specific claim about historical perspective rather than generic praise.

How does Reminiscences of a Stock Operator compare to Market Wizards on Reddit?+

In the data, the two books appear together in recommendation lists — the ↑17 and ↑31 r/investing threads both stack them. Reminiscences comes first in the ↑17 list. Market Wizards has substantially more Reddit visibility overall, but the pairing suggests r/investing treats them as complementary: one is primary source, one is oral history.

Should I read Reminiscences of a Stock Operator if I'm a passive investor?+

Depends on your appetite for financial history. The r/Bogleheads mention (↑16) is a single pairing with no explanation. The book isn't about index funds or asset allocation — it's about speculation, discipline, and losing money in ways that no longer exist. Worth it if that sounds interesting. Not worth it if you want something applicable to a three-fund portfolio.